The Bank¶
Introduction¶
In this tutorial, SimPy is used to develop a simple simulation of a bank with a number of tellers. This Python package provides Processes to model active components such as messages, customers, trucks, and planes. It has three classes to model facilities where congestion might occur: Resources for ordinary queues, Levels for the supply of quantities of material, and Stores for collections of individual items. Only examples of Resources are described here. It also provides Monitors and Tallys to record data like queue lengths and delay times and to calculate simple averages. It uses the standard Python random package to generate random numbers.
Starting with SimPy 2.0 an object-oriented programmer’s interface was added to the package. It is compatible with the current procedural approach which is used in most of the models described here.
SimPy can be obtained from: https://github.com/SimPyClassic/SimPyClassic. The examples run with SimPy version 1.5 and later. This tutorial is best read with the SimPy Manual or Cheatsheet at your side for reference.
Before attempting to use SimPy you should be familiar with the Python language. In particular you should be able to use classes. Python is free and available for most machine types. You can find out more about it at the Python web site. SimPy is compatible with Python version 2.7 and Python 3.x.
A customer arriving at a fixed time¶
In this tutorial we model a simple bank with customers arriving at
random. We develop the model step-by-step, starting out simply, and
producing a running program at each stage. The programs we develop are
available without line numbers and ready to go, in the
bankprograms
directory. Please copy them, run them and improve
them - and in the tradition of open-source software suggest your
modifications to the SimPy users list. Object-Oriented versions of all
the models are included in the bankprograms_OO sub directory.
A simulation should always be developed to answer a specific question; in these models we investigate how changing the number of bank servers or tellers might affect the waiting time for customers.
We first model a single customer who arrives at the bank for a visit, looks around at the decor for a time and then leaves. There is no queueing. First we will assume his arrival time and the time he spends in the bank are fixed.
We define a Customer
class derived from the SimPy Process
class. We create a Customer
object, c
who arrives at the bank
at simulation time 5.0
and leaves after a fixed time of 10.0
minutes.
Examine the following listing which is a complete runnable Python script. We use comments to divide the script up into sections. This makes for clarity later when the programs get more complicated. At #1 is a normal Python documentation string; #2 imports the SimPy simulation code.
The Customer
class definition at #3 defines our customer class and has
the required generator method (called visit
#4) having a yield
statement #6. Such a method is called a Process Execution Method (PEM) in
SimPy.
The customer’s visit
PEM at #4, models his activities. When he
arrives (it will turn out to be a ‘he’ in this model), he will print out the
simulation time, now()
, and his name at #5. The function now()
can be used at any time in the simulation to find the current simulation time
though it cannot be changed by the programmer. The customer’s name will be set
when the customer is created later in the script at #10.
He then stays in the bank for a fixed simulation time timeInBank
at #6.
This is achieved by the yield hold,self,timeInBank
statement. This is the
first of the special simulation commands that SimPy
offers.
After a simulation time of timeInBank
, the program’s execution
returns to the line after the yield
statement at #6. The
customer then prints out the current simulation time and his
name at #7. This completes the declaration of the Customer
class.
The call initialize()
at #9 sets up the simulation
system ready to receive activate
calls. At #10, we create
a customer, c
, with name Klaus
. All SimPy Processes have a
name
attribute. We activate
Klaus
at #11
specifying the object (c
) to be activated, the call of the action
routine (c.visit(timeInBank = 10.0)
) and that it is to be activated
at time 5 (at = 5.0
). This will activate
Klaus
exactly 5
minutes after the current time, in this case
after the start of the simulation at 0.0
. The call of an action
routine such as c.visit
can specify the values of arguments, here
the timeInBank
.
Finally the call of simulate(until=maxTime)
at #12 will
start the simulation. This will run until the simulation time is
maxTime
unless stopped beforehand either by the
stopSimulation()
command or by running out of events to execute
(as will happen here). maxTime
was set to 100.0
at #8.
""" bank01: The single non-random Customer """ # 1
from SimPy.Simulation import * # 2
# Model components -----------------------------
class Customer(Process): # 3
""" Customer arrives, looks around and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank): # 4
print("%2.1f %s Here I am" % (now(), self.name)) # 5
yield hold, self, timeInBank # 6
print("%2.1f %s I must leave" % (now(), self.name)) # 7
# Experiment data ------------------------------
maxTime = 100.0 # minutes #8
timeInBank = 10.0 # minutes
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
initialize() # 9
c = Customer(name="Klaus") # 10
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank), at=5.0) # 11
simulate(until=maxTime) # 12
The short trace printed out by the print
statements shows the
result. The program finishes at simulation time 15.0
because there are
no further events to be executed. At the end of the visit
routine,
the customer has no more actions and no other objects or customers are
active.
5.0 Klaus Here I am
15.0 Klaus I must leave
The Bank in object-oriented style¶
Now look at the same model developed in object-oriented style. As before
Klaus
arrives at the bank for a visit, looks around at the decor
for a time and then leaves. There is no queueing. The arrival time
and the time he spends in the bank are fixed.
The key point is that we create a Simulation
object and run
that. In the program at #1 we import a new class, Simulation
together with the familiar Process
class, and the hold
verb. Here we are using the recommended explicit form of import rather
than the deprecated import *
.
Just as before, we define a Customer
class, derived from the SimPy
Process
class, which has the required generator method (PEM), here
called visit
.
The customer’s visit
PEM models his activities. When he arrives
at the bank Klaus will print out both the current simulation time,
self.sim.now()
, and his name, self.name
. The prefix
self.sim
is a reference to the simulation object where this
customer exists, thus self.sim.now()
refers to the clock for that
simulation object. Every Process
instance is linked to the
simulation in which it is created by assigning to its sim
parameter when it is created (at #4).
Now comes the major difference from the Classical SimPy program
structure. We define a class BankModel
from the Simulation
class at #3. Now any instance of BankModel
is an
independent simulation with its own event list and its own time
axis. A BankModel
instance can activate processes and start the
execution of a simulation on its time axis.
In the BankModel
class, we define a run
method which, when
executes the BankModel
instance, i.e. performs a simulation
experiment. When it starts it initializes the simulation with it event
list and sets the time to 0.
#4 creates a Customer
object and the parameter assignment sim =
self
ties the customer instance to this and only this
simulation. The customer does not exist outside this simulation. The
call of simulate(until=maxTime)
at #5 starts the
simulation. It will run until the simulation time is maxTime
unless stopped beforehand either by the stopSimulation()
command
or by running out of events to execute (as will happen
here). maxTime
is set to 100.0
at #6.
Note
If model classes like the BankModel
are to be given any other
attributes, they must have an __init__
method in which these
attributes are assigned. Such an __init__
method must first call
Simulation.__init__(self)
to also initialize the
Simulation
class from which the model inherits.
A new, independent simulation object, mymodel
, is created
at #7. Its run
method is executed at #8.
""" bank01_OO: The single non-random Customer """
from SimPy.Simulation import Simulation, Process, hold # 1
# Model components -----------------------------
class Customer(Process): # 2
""" Customer arrives, looks around and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank):
print("%2.1f %s Here I am" %
(self.sim.now(), self.name))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
print("%2.1f %s I must leave" %
(self.sim.now(), self.name))
# Model ----------------------------------------
class BankModel(Simulation): # 3
def run(self):
""" An independent simulation object """
c = Customer(name="Klaus", sim=self) # 4
self.activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank), at=tArrival)
self.simulate(until=maxTime) # 5
# Experiment data ------------------------------
maxTime = 100.0 # minutes #6
timeInBank = 10.0 # minutes
tArrival = 5.0 # minutes
# Experiment -----------------------------------
mymodel = BankModel() # 7
mymodel.run() # 8
The short trace printed out by the print
statements shows the
result. The program finishes at simulation time 15.0
because there are
no further events to be executed. At the end of the visit
routine,
the customer has no more actions and no other objects or customers are
active.
5.0 Klaus Here I am
15.0 Klaus I must leave
All of The Bank programs have been written in both the procedural and object orientated styles.
A customer arriving at random¶
Now we extend the model to allow our customer to arrive at a random simulated time though we will keep the time in the bank at 10.0, as before.
The change occurs at #1, #2, #3, and #4 in the program. At #1 we
import from the standard Python random
module to give us
expovariate
to generate the random time of arrival. We also import
the seed
function to initialize the random number stream to allow
control of the random numbers. At #2 we provide an initial seed of
99999
. An exponential random variate, t
, is generated
at #3. Note that the Python Random module’s expovariate
function
uses the average rate (that is, 1.0/mean
) as the argument. The
generated random variate, t
, is used at #4 as the at
argument
to the activate
call.
""" bank05: The single Random Customer """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed # 1
# Model components ------------------------
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives at a random time,
looks around and then leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank):
print("%f %s Here I am" % (now(), self.name))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
print("%f %s I must leave" % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxTime = 100.0 # minutes
timeInBank = 10.0
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(99999) # 2
initialize()
c = Customer(name="Klaus")
t = expovariate(1.0 / 5.0) # 3
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank), at=t) # 4
simulate(until=maxTime)
The result is shown below. The customer now arrives at about 0.64195, (or 10.58092 if you are not using Python 3). Changing the seed value would change that time.
0.641954 Klaus Here I am
10.641954 Klaus I must leave
The display looks pretty untidy. In the next example I will try and make it tidier.
If you are not using Python 3, your output may differ. The output for Python 2, for all examples, is given in Appendix A.
More customers¶
Our simulation does little so far. To consider a simulation with
several customers we return to the simple deterministic model and add
more Customers
.
The program is almost as easy as the first example (A Customer
arriving at a fixed time). The main change is between
#4 to #5 where we create, name, and activate three
customers. We also increase the maximum simulation time to 400
(at #3 and referred to at #6). Observe that we need
only one definition of the Customer
class and create several
objects of that class. These will act quite independently in this
model.
Each customer stays for a different timeinbank
so, instead of
setting a common value for this we set it for each customer. The
customers are started at different times (using at=
). Tony's
activation time occurs before Klaus's
, so Tony
will arrive
first even though his activation statement appears later in the
script.
As promised, the print statements have been changed to use Python string formatting (at #1 and #2). The statements look complicated but the output is much nicer.
""" bank02: More Customers """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
# Model components ------------------------
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, looks around and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank):
print("%7.4f %s: Here I am" % (now(), self.name)) # 1
yield hold, self, timeInBank
print("%7.4f %s: I must leave" % (now(), self.name)) # 2
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes #3
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
initialize()
c1 = Customer(name="Klaus") # 4
activate(c1, c1.visit(timeInBank=10.0), at=5.0)
c2 = Customer(name="Tony")
activate(c2, c2.visit(timeInBank=7.0), at=2.0)
c3 = Customer(name="Evelyn")
activate(c3, c3.visit(timeInBank=20.0), at=12.0) # 5
simulate(until=maxTime) # 6
The trace produced by the program is shown below. Again the
simulation finishes before the 400.0
specified in the simulate
call as it has run out of events.
2.0000 Tony: Here I am
5.0000 Klaus: Here I am
9.0000 Tony: I must leave
12.0000 Evelyn: Here I am
15.0000 Klaus: I must leave
32.0000 Evelyn: I must leave
Many customers¶
Another change will allow us to have more customers. As it is
tedious to give a specially chosen name to each one, we will
call them Customer00, Customer01,...
and use a separate
Source
class to create and activate them. To make things clearer
we do not use the random numbers in this model.
The following listing shows the new program. At #1 to #4 a Source
class is defined. Its PEM, here called generate
, is
defined between #2 to #4. This PEM has a couple of arguments:
the number
of customers to be generated and the Time Between
Arrivals, TBA
. It consists of a loop that creates a sequence
of numbered Customers
from 0
to (number-1)
, inclusive. We
create a customer and give it a name at #3. It is
then activated at the current simulation time (the final argument of
the activate
statement is missing so that the default value of
now()
is used as the time). We also specify how long the customer
is to stay in the bank. To keep it simple, all customers stay
exactly 12
minutes. After each new customer is activated, the
Source
holds for a fixed time (yield hold,self,TBA
)
before creating the next one (at #4).
A Source
, s
, is created at #5 and activated at
#6 where the number of customers to be generated is set to
maxNumber = 5
and the interval between customers to ARRint =
10.0
. Once started at time 0.0
it creates customers at intervals
and each customer then operates independently of the others:
""" bank03: Many non-random Customers """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process): # 1
""" Source generates customers regularly """
def generate(self, number, TBA): # 2
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i)) # 3
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=12.0))
yield hold, self, TBA # 4
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, looks around and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank):
print("%7.4f %s: Here I am" % (now(), self.name))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
print("%7.4f %s: I must leave" % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 5
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # time between arrivals, minutes
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
initialize()
s = Source() # 5
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber, # 6
TBA=ARRint), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
The output is:
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
10.0000 Customer01: Here I am
12.0000 Customer00: I must leave
20.0000 Customer02: Here I am
22.0000 Customer01: I must leave
30.0000 Customer03: Here I am
32.0000 Customer02: I must leave
40.0000 Customer04: Here I am
42.0000 Customer03: I must leave
52.0000 Customer04: I must leave
Many random customers¶
We now extend this model to allow arrivals at random. In simulation this
is usually interpreted as meaning that the times between customer
arrivals are distributed as exponential random variates. There is
little change in our program, we use a Source
object, as before.
The exponential random variate is generated at #1 with
meanTBA
as the mean Time Between Arrivals and used at
#2. Note that this parameter is not exactly intuitive. As already
mentioned, the Python expovariate
method uses the rate of
arrivals as the parameter not the average interval between them. The
exponential delay between two arrivals gives pseudo-random
arrivals. In this model the first customer arrives at time 0.0
.
The seed
method is called to initialize the random number stream
in the model
routine (at #3). It is possible to leave this
call out but if we wish to do serious comparisons of systems, we must
have control over the random variates and therefore control over the
seeds. Then we can run identical models with different seeds or
different models with identical seeds. We provide the seeds as
control parameters of the run. Here a seed is assigned at #3
but it is clear it could have been read in or manually entered on an
input form.
""" bank06: Many Random Customers """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers at random """
def generate(self, number, meanTBA):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=12.0))
t = expovariate(1.0 / meanTBA) # 1
yield hold, self, t # 2
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, looks around and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank=0):
print("%7.4f %s: Here I am" % (now(), self.name))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
print("%7.4f %s: I must leave" % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 5
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean arrival interval, minutes
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(99999) # 3
initialize()
s = Source(name='Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber,
meanTBA=ARRint), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
with the following output:
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
1.2839 Customer01: Here I am
4.9842 Customer02: Here I am
12.0000 Customer00: I must leave
13.2839 Customer01: I must leave
16.9842 Customer02: I must leave
35.5432 Customer03: Here I am
47.5432 Customer03: I must leave
48.9918 Customer04: Here I am
60.9918 Customer04: I must leave
Service Counters¶
We introduce a service counter at the Bank using a SimPy Resource.
A service counter¶
So far, the model has been more like an art gallery, the customers
entering, looking around, and leaving. Now they are going to require
service from the bank clerk. We extend the model to include a service
counter which will be modelled as an object of SimPy’s Resource
class with a single resource unit. The actions of a Resource
are
simple: a customer requests
a unit of the resource (a clerk). If
one is free he gets service (and removes the unit). If there is no
free clerk the customer joins the queue (managed by the resource
object) until it is their turn to be served. As each customer
completes service and releases
the unit, the clerk can start
serving the next in line.
The service counter is created as a Resource
(k
) in
at #8. This is provided as an argument to the Source
(at #9)
which, in turn, provides it to each customer it creates and activates
(at #1).
The actions involving the service counter, k
, in the customer’s
PEM are:
- the
yield request
statement at #3. If the server is free then the customer can start service immediately and the code moves on to #4. If the server is busy, the customer is automatically queued by the Resource. When it eventually comes available the PEM moves on to #4. - the
yield hold
statement at #5 where the operation of the service counter is modelled. Here the service time is a fixedtimeInBank
. During this period the customer is being served. - the
yield release
statement at #6. The current customer completes service and the service counter becomes available for any remaining customers in the queue.
Observe that the service counter is used with the pattern (yield request..
; yield hold..
; yield release..
).
To show the effect of the service counter on the activities of the
customers, I have added #2 to record when the customer
arrived and #4 to record the time between arrival in the
bank and starting service. #4 is after the yield
request
command and will be reached only when the request is
satisfied. It is before the yield hold
that corresponds to the
start of service. The variable wait
will record how long the
customer waited and will be 0 if he received service at once. This
technique of saving the arrival time in a variable is common. So the
print
statement also prints out how long the customer waited in
the bank before starting service.
""" bank07: One Counter,random arrivals """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, meanTBA, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=12.0,
res=resource)) # 1
t = expovariate(1.0 / meanTBA)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank, res):
arrive = now() # 2 arrival time
print("%8.3f %s: Here I am" % (now(), self.name))
yield request, self, res # 3
wait = now() - arrive # 4 waiting time
print("%8.3f %s: Waited %6.3f" % (now(), self.name, wait))
yield hold, self, timeInBank # 5
yield release, self, res # 6
print("%8.3f %s: Finished" % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 5 # 7
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean, minutes
k = Resource(name="Counter", unitName="Clerk") # 8
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(99999)
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber,
meanTBA=ARRint, resource=k), at=0.0) # 9
simulate(until=maxTime)
Examining the trace we see that the first, and last, customers get instant service but the others have to wait. We still only have five customers (#7) so we cannot draw general conclusions.
0.000 Customer00: Here I am
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
1.284 Customer01: Here I am
4.984 Customer02: Here I am
12.000 Customer00: Finished
12.000 Customer01: Waited 10.716
24.000 Customer01: Finished
24.000 Customer02: Waited 19.016
35.543 Customer03: Here I am
36.000 Customer02: Finished
36.000 Customer03: Waited 0.457
48.000 Customer03: Finished
48.992 Customer04: Here I am
48.992 Customer04: Waited 0.000
60.992 Customer04: Finished
A server with a random service time¶
This is a simple change to the model in that we retain the single
service counter but make the customer service time a random
variable. As is traditional in the study of simple queues we first
assume an exponential service time and set the mean to timeInBank
.
The service time random variable, tib
, is generated at
#1 and used at #2. The argument to be used in the call
of expovariate
is not the mean of the distribution,
timeInBank
, but is the rate 1/timeInBank
.
We have also collected together a number of constants by defining a number of appropriate variables and giving them values. These are in lines between marks #3 and #4.
""" bank08: A counter with a random service time """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, meanTBA, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i,))
activate(c, c.visit(b=resource))
t = expovariate(1.0 / meanTBA)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, b):
arrive = now()
print("%8.4f %s: Here I am " % (now(), self.name))
yield request, self, b
wait = now() - arrive
print("%8.4f %s: Waited %6.3f" % (now(), self.name, wait))
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank) # 1
yield hold, self, tib # 2
yield release, self, b
print("%8.4f %s: Finished " % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 5 # 3
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
timeInBank = 12.0 # mean, minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean, minutes
theseed = 99999 # 4
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(theseed)
k = Resource(name="Counter", unitName="Clerk")
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber, meanTBA=ARRint,
resource=k), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
And the output:
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
0.0000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
1.2839 Customer01: Here I am
4.4403 Customer00: Finished
4.4403 Customer01: Waited 3.156
20.5786 Customer01: Finished
31.8430 Customer02: Here I am
31.8430 Customer02: Waited 0.000
34.5594 Customer02: Finished
36.2308 Customer03: Here I am
36.2308 Customer03: Waited 0.000
41.4313 Customer04: Here I am
67.1315 Customer03: Finished
67.1315 Customer04: Waited 25.700
87.9241 Customer04: Finished
This model with random arrivals and exponential service times is an example of an M/M/1 queue and could rather easily be solved analytically to calculate the steady-state mean waiting time and other operating characteristics. (But not so easily solved for its transient behavior.)
Several service counters¶
When we introduce several counters we must decide on a queue discipline. Are customers going to make one queue or are they going to form separate queues in front of each counter? Then there are complications - will they be allowed to switch lines (jockey)? We first consider a single queue with several counters and later consider separate isolated queues. We will not look at jockeying.
Here we model a bank whose customers arrive randomly and are to be served at a group of counters, taking a random time for service, where we assume that waiting customers form a single first-in first-out queue.
The only difference between this model and the single-server model
is at #1. We have provided two counters by increasing the
capacity of the counter
resource to 2. These units of the
resource correspond to the two counters. Because both clerks cannot be
called Karen
, we have used a general name of Clerk
.
""" bank09: Several Counters but a Single Queue """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, meanTBA, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(b=resource))
t = expovariate(1.0 / meanTBA)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, b):
arrive = now()
print("%8.4f %s: Here I am " % (now(), self.name))
yield request, self, b
wait = now() - arrive
print("%8.4f %s: Waited %6.3f" % (now(), self.name, wait))
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank)
yield hold, self, tib
yield release, self, b
print("%8.4f %s: Finished " % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 5
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
timeInBank = 12.0 # mean, minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean, minutes
theseed = 99999
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(theseed)
k = Resource(capacity=2, name="Counter", unitName="Clerk") # 1
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber, meanTBA=ARRint,
resource=k), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
The waiting times in this model are very different from those for the single service counter. For example, none of the customers had to wait. But, again, we have observed too few customers to draw general conclusions.
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
0.0000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
1.2839 Customer01: Here I am
1.2839 Customer01: Waited 0.000
4.4403 Customer00: Finished
17.4222 Customer01: Finished
31.8430 Customer02: Here I am
31.8430 Customer02: Waited 0.000
34.5594 Customer02: Finished
36.2308 Customer03: Here I am
36.2308 Customer03: Waited 0.000
41.4313 Customer04: Here I am
41.4313 Customer04: Waited 0.000
62.2239 Customer04: Finished
67.1315 Customer03: Finished
Several counters with individual queues¶
Each counter now has its own queue. The programming is more complicated because the customer has to decide which one to join. The obvious technique is to make each counter a separate resource and it is useful to make a list of resource objects (#7).
In practice, a customer will join the shortest queue. So we define
a Python function, NoInSystem(R)
(#1 to #2) to
return the sum of the number waiting and the number being served for
a particular counter, R
. This function is used at #3 to
list the numbers at each counter. It is then easy to find which
counter the arriving customer should join. We have also modified the
trace printout, #4 to display the state of the system when
the customer arrives. We choose the shortest queue at
#5 to #6 (using the variable choice
).
The rest of the program is the same as before.
""" bank10: Several Counters with individual queues"""
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly"""
def generate(self, number, interval, counters):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(counters))
t = expovariate(1.0 / interval)
yield hold, self, t
def NoInSystem(R): # 1
""" Total number of customers in the resource R"""
return (len(R.waitQ) + len(R.activeQ)) # 2
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, chooses the shortest queue
is served and leaves
"""
def visit(self, counters):
arrive = now()
Qlength = [NoInSystem(counters[i]) for i in range(Nc)] # 3
print("%7.4f %s: Here I am. %s" % (now(), self.name, Qlength)) # 4
for i in range(Nc): # 5
if Qlength[i] == 0 or Qlength[i] == min(Qlength):
choice = i # the index of the shortest line
break # 6
yield request, self, counters[choice]
wait = now() - arrive
print("%7.4f %s: Waited %6.3f" % (now(), self.name, wait))
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank)
yield hold, self, tib
yield release, self, counters[choice]
print("%7.4f %s: Finished" % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 5
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
timeInBank = 12.0 # mean, minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean, minutes
Nc = 2 # number of counters
theseed = 787878
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(theseed)
kk = [Resource(name="Clerk0"), Resource(name="Clerk1")] # 7
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber, interval=ARRint,
counters=kk), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
The results show how the customers choose the counter with the
smallest number. Unlucky Customer03
who joins the wrong queue has
to wait until Customer01
finishes before his service can be
started. There are, however, too few arrivals in these runs, limited
as they are to five customers, to draw any general conclusions about
the relative efficiencies of the two systems.
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am. [0, 0]
0.0000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
9.7519 Customer00: Finished
12.0829 Customer01: Here I am. [0, 0]
12.0829 Customer01: Waited 0.000
25.9167 Customer02: Here I am. [1, 0]
25.9167 Customer02: Waited 0.000
38.2349 Customer03: Here I am. [1, 1]
40.4032 Customer04: Here I am. [2, 1]
43.0677 Customer02: Finished
43.0677 Customer04: Waited 2.664
44.0242 Customer01: Finished
44.0242 Customer03: Waited 5.789
60.1271 Customer03: Finished
70.2500 Customer04: Finished
Customer’s Priority¶
In Many situations there is a system of priority service. Those customers with high priority are served first, those with low priority must wait. In some cases, preemptive priority will even allow a high-priority customer to interrupt the service of one with a lower priority.
Priority customers¶
SimPy implements priority requests with an extra numerical priority
argument in the yield request
command, higher values meaning
higher priority. For this to operate, the requested Resource must have
been defined with qType=PriorityQ
.
In the first example, we modify the program with random arrivals, one
counter, and a fixed service time with the addition of a high priority
customer. Warning: The seed()
value has been changed to 787878
to make the story more exciting. To make things even more confusing,
your results may be different from those here because the random
module gives different results for Python 2.x and 3.x.,
The main modifications are to the definition of the counter
where
we change the qType
and to the yield request
command in the
visit
PEM of the customer. We must provide each customer with a
priority. Since the default is priority=0
this is easy for most of
them.
To observe the priority in action, while all other customers have the
default priority of 0, at between #5 and #6 we create and
activate one special customer, Guido
, with priority 100 who
arrives at time 23.0
.
The visit
customer method has a new parameter, P
(at
#3), which allows us to set the customer priority.
At #4, counter
is defined with qType=PriorityQ
so
that we can request it with priority (at #3) using the
statement yield request,self,counter,P
At #2, we now print out the number of customers waiting when each customer arrives.
""" bank20: One counter with a priority customer """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, interval, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=12.0,
res=resource, P=0))
t = expovariate(1.0 / interval)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank=0, res=None, P=0): # 1
arrive = now() # arrival time
Nwaiting = len(res.waitQ)
print("%8.3f %s: Queue is %d on arrival" % # 2
(now(), self.name, Nwaiting))
yield request, self, res, P # 3
wait = now() - arrive # waiting time
print("%8.3f %s: Waited %6.3f" %
(now(), self.name, wait))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
yield release, self, res
print("%8.3f %s: Completed" %
(now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
k = Resource(name="Counter", unitName="Karen", # 4
qType=PriorityQ)
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(787878)
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=5, interval=10.0,
resource=k), at=0.0)
guido = Customer(name="Guido ") # 5
activate(guido, guido.visit(timeInBank=12.0, res=k, # 6
P=100), at=23.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
The resulting output is as follows. The number of customers in the queue just as each arrives is displayed in the trace. That count does not include any customer in service.
0.000 Customer00: Queue is 0 on arrival
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
12.000 Customer00: Completed
12.083 Customer01: Queue is 0 on arrival
12.083 Customer01: Waited 0.000
20.210 Customer02: Queue is 0 on arrival
23.000 Guido : Queue is 1 on arrival
24.083 Customer01: Completed
24.083 Guido : Waited 1.083
34.043 Customer03: Queue is 1 on arrival
36.083 Guido : Completed
36.083 Customer02: Waited 15.873
48.083 Customer02: Completed
48.083 Customer03: Waited 14.040
60.083 Customer03: Completed
60.661 Customer04: Queue is 0 on arrival
60.661 Customer04: Waited 0.000
72.661 Customer04: Completed
Reading carefully one can see that when Guido
arrives
Customer00
has been served and left at 12.000
, Customer01
is in service and Customer02 is waiting in the queue. Guido
has priority over any waiting customers and is served
before the at 24.083
. When Guido
leaves at 36.083
,
Customer02
starts service having waited 15.873
minutes.
A priority customer with preemption¶
Now we allow Guido
to have preemptive priority. He will displace
any customer in service when he arrives. That customer will resume
when Guido
finishes (unless higher priority customers
intervene). It requires only a change to one line of the program,
adding the argument, preemptable=True
to the Resource
statement at #1.
""" bank23: One counter with a priority customer with preemption """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, interval, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=12.0,
res=resource, P=0))
t = expovariate(1.0 / interval)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank=0, res=None, P=0):
arrive = now() # arrival time
Nwaiting = len(res.waitQ)
print("%8.3f %s: Queue is %d on arrival" %
(now(), self.name, Nwaiting))
yield request, self, res, P
wait = now() - arrive # waiting time
print("%8.3f %s: Waited %6.3f" %
(now(), self.name, wait))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
yield release, self, res
print("%8.3f %s: Completed" %
(now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
k = Resource(name="Counter", unitName="Karen", # 1
qType=PriorityQ, preemptable=True)
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(989898)
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=5, interval=10.0,
resource=k), at=0.0)
guido = Customer(name="Guido ")
activate(guido, guido.visit(timeInBank=12.0, res=k,
P=100), at=23.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
Though Guido
arrives at the same time, 23.000
, he no longer
has to wait and immediately goes into service, displacing the
incumbent, Customer01
. That customer had already completed
23.000-12.083 = 10.917
minutes of his service. When Guido
finishes at 36.083
, Customer01
resumes service and takes
36.083-35.000 = 1.083
minutes to finish. His total service time
is the same as before (12.000
minutes).
0.000 Customer00: Queue is 0 on arrival
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
8.634 Customer01: Queue is 0 on arrival
12.000 Customer00: Completed
12.000 Customer01: Waited 3.366
16.016 Customer02: Queue is 0 on arrival
19.882 Customer03: Queue is 1 on arrival
20.246 Customer04: Queue is 2 on arrival
23.000 Guido : Queue is 3 on arrival
23.000 Guido : Waited 0.000
35.000 Guido : Completed
36.000 Customer01: Completed
36.000 Customer02: Waited 19.984
48.000 Customer02: Completed
48.000 Customer03: Waited 28.118
60.000 Customer03: Completed
60.000 Customer04: Waited 39.754
72.000 Customer04: Completed
Balking and Reneging Customers¶
Balking occurs when a customer refuses to join a queue if it is too long. Reneging (or, better, abandonment) occurs if an impatient customer gives up while still waiting and before being served.
Balking customers¶
Another term for a system with balking customers is one where “blocked customers” are “cleared”, termed by engineers a BCC system. This is very convenient analytically in queueing theory and formulae developed using this assumption are used extensively for planning communication systems. The easiest case is when no queueing is allowed.
As an example let us investigate a BCC system with a single server but
the waiting space is limited. We will estimate the rate of balking
when the maximum number in the queue is set to 1. On arrival into the
system the customer must first check to see if there is room. We will
need the number of customers in the system or waiting. We could keep a
count, incrementing when a customer joins the queue or, since we have
a Resource, use the length of the Resource’s waitQ
. Choosing the
latter we test (at #1). If there is not enough room, we balk,
incrementing a Class variable Customer.numBalking
at #2 to
get the total number balking during the run.
""" bank24. BCC system with several counters """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, meanTBA, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(b=resource))
t = expovariate(1.0 / meanTBA)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
numBalking = 0
def visit(self, b):
arrive = now()
print("%8.4f %s: Here I am " %
(now(), self.name))
if len(b.waitQ) < maxInQueue: # 1
yield request, self, b
wait = now() - arrive
print("%8.4f %s: Wait %6.3f" %
(now(), self.name, wait))
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank)
yield hold, self, tib
yield release, self, b
print("%8.4f %s: Finished " %
(now(), self.name))
else:
Customer.numBalking += 1 # 2
print("%8.4f %s: BALKING " %
(now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------------
timeInBank = 12.0 # mean, minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean interarrival time, minutes
numServers = 1 # servers
maxInSystem = 2 # customers
maxInQueue = maxInSystem - numServers
maxNumber = 8
maxTime = 4000.0 # minutes
theseed = 212121
# Model/Experiment ------------------------------
seed(theseed)
k = Resource(capacity=numServers,
name="Counter", unitName="Clerk")
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber,
meanTBA=ARRint,
resource=k), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
# Results -----------------------------------------
nb = float(Customer.numBalking)
print("balking rate is %8.4f per minute" % (nb / now()))
The resulting output for a run of this program showing balking occurring is given below:
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
0.0000 Customer00: Wait 0.000
4.3077 Customer01: Here I am
5.6957 Customer02: Here I am
5.6957 Customer02: BALKING
6.9774 Customer03: Here I am
6.9774 Customer03: BALKING
8.2476 Customer00: Finished
8.2476 Customer01: Wait 3.940
21.1312 Customer04: Here I am
22.4840 Customer01: Finished
22.4840 Customer04: Wait 1.353
23.0923 Customer05: Here I am
23.1537 Customer06: Here I am
23.1537 Customer06: BALKING
36.0653 Customer04: Finished
36.0653 Customer05: Wait 12.973
38.4851 Customer07: Here I am
53.1056 Customer05: Finished
53.1056 Customer07: Wait 14.620
60.3558 Customer07: Finished
balking rate is 0.0497 per minute
When Customer02
arrives, Customer00
is already in service and
Customer01
is waiting. There is no room so Customer02
balks. In fact another customer, Customer03
arrives and balks
before Customer00
is finished.
The balking pattern for python 2.x is different.
Reneging or abandoning¶
Often in practice an impatient customer will leave the queue before being served. SimPy can model this reneging behaviour using a compound yield statement. In such a statement there are two yield clauses. An example is:
yield (request,self,counter),(hold,self,maxWaitTime)
The first tuple of this statement is the usual yield request
,
asking for a unit of counter
Resource. The process will either get
the unit immediately or be queued by the Resource. The second tuple is
a reneging clause which has the same syntax as a yield hold
. The
requesting process will renege if the wait exceeds maxWaitTime
.
There is a complication, though. The requesting PEM must discover what
actually happened. Did the process get the resource or did it
renege? This involves a mandatory test of self.acquired(
resource)
. In our example, this test is at #1.
""" bank21: One counter with impatient customers """
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly """
def generate(self, number, interval):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=15.0))
t = expovariate(1.0 / interval)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank=0):
arrive = now() # arrival time
print("%8.3f %s: Here I am " % (now(), self.name))
yield (request, self, counter), (hold, self, maxWaitTime)
wait = now() - arrive # waiting time
if self.acquired(counter): # 1
print("%8.3f %s: Waited %6.3f" % (now(), self.name, wait))
yield hold, self, timeInBank
yield release, self, counter
print("%8.3f %s: Completed" % (now(), self.name))
else:
print("%8.3f %s: Waited %6.3f. I am off" %
(now(), self.name, wait))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
maxWaitTime = 12.0 # minutes. maximum time to wait
# Model ----------------------------------
def model():
global counter
seed(989898)
counter = Resource(name="Karen")
initialize()
source = Source('Source')
activate(source,
source.generate(number=5, interval=10.0), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
# Experiment ----------------------------------
model()
0.000 Customer00: Here I am
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
8.634 Customer01: Here I am
15.000 Customer00: Completed
15.000 Customer01: Waited 6.366
16.016 Customer02: Here I am
19.882 Customer03: Here I am
20.246 Customer04: Here I am
28.016 Customer02: Waited 12.000. I am off
30.000 Customer01: Completed
30.000 Customer03: Waited 10.118
32.246 Customer04: Waited 12.000. I am off
45.000 Customer03: Completed
Customer02
arrives at 16.016 but has only 12 minutes
patience. After that time in the queue (at time 28.016) he abandons
the queue to leave 03 to take his place. 04 also abandons.
The reneging pattern for python 2.x is different due to a different expovariate implementation.
Gathering Statistics¶
SimPy Monitors allow statistics to be gathered and simple summaries calculated.
The bank with a monitor¶
The traces of output that have been displayed so far are valuable for checking that the simulation is operating correctly but would become too much if we simulate a whole day. We do need to get results from our simulation to answer the original questions. What, then, is the best way to summarize the results?
One way is to analyze the traces elsewhere, piping the trace output, or a modified version of it, into a real statistical program such as R for statistical analysis, or into a file for later examination by a spreadsheet. We do not have space to examine this thoroughly here. Another way of presenting the results is to provide graphical output.
SimPy offers an easy way to gather a few simple statistics such as
averages: the Monitor
and Tally
classes. The Monitor
records the values of chosen variables as time series (but see the
comments in Final Remarks).
We now demonstrate a Monitor
that records the average waiting
times for our customers. We return to the system with random arrivals,
random service times and a single queue and remove the old trace
statements. In practice, we would make the printouts controlled by a
variable, say, TRACE
which is set in the experimental data (or
read in as a program option - but that is a different story). This
would aid in debugging and would not complicate the data analysis. We
will run the simulations for many more arrivals.
A Monitor, wM
, is created at #2. It observes
and
records the waiting time mentioned at #1. We run
maxNumber=50
customers (in the call of generate
at
#3) and have increased maxTime
to 1000
minutes. Brief
statistics are given by the Monitor methods count()
and mean()
at #4.
""" bank11: The bank with a Monitor"""
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly"""
def generate(self, number, interval, resource):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(b=resource))
t = expovariate(1.0 / interval)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, b):
arrive = now()
yield request, self, b
wait = now() - arrive
wM.observe(wait) # 1
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank)
yield hold, self, tib
yield release, self, b
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 50
maxTime = 1000.0 # minutes
timeInBank = 12.0 # mean, minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean, minutes
Nc = 2 # number of counters
theseed = 99999
# Model/Experiment ----------------------
seed(theseed)
k = Resource(capacity=Nc, name="Clerk")
wM = Monitor() # 2
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber, interval=ARRint,
resource=k), at=0.0) # 3
simulate(until=maxTime)
# Result ----------------------------------
result = wM.count(), wM.mean() # 4
print("Average wait for %3d completions was %5.3f minutes." % result)
The average waiting time for 50 customers in this 2-counter system is more reliable (i.e., less subject to random simulation effects) than the times we measured before but it is still not sufficiently reliable for real-world decisions. We should also replicate the runs using different random number seeds. The result of this run (using Python 3.2) is:
Average wait for 50 completions was 8.941 minutes.
Result for Python 2.x is given in Appendix A.
Monitoring a resource¶
Now consider observing the number of customers waiting or executing in
a Resource. Because of the need to observe
the value after the
change but at the same simulation instant, it is impossible to use the
length of the Resource’s waitQ
directly with a Monitor defined
outside the Resource. Instead Resources can be set up with built-in
Monitors.
Here is an example using a Monitored Resource. We intend to observe
the average number waiting and active in the counter
resource. counter
is defined at #1 and we have set
monitored=True
. This establishes two Monitors: waitMon
, to
record changes in the numbers waiting and actMon
to record changes
in the numbers active in the counter
. We need make no further
change to the operation of the program as monitoring is then
automatic. No observe
calls are necessary.
At the end of the run in the model
function, we calculate the
timeAverage
of both waitMon
and actMon
and return them
from the model
call (at #2). These can then be printed at
the end of the program (at #3).
"""bank15: Monitoring a Resource"""
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly"""
def generate(self, number, rate):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(timeInBank=12.0))
yield hold, self, expovariate(rate)
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, timeInBank):
arrive = now()
print("%8.4f %s: Arrived " % (now(), self.name))
yield request, self, counter
print("%8.4f %s: Got counter " % (now(), self.name))
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank)
yield hold, self, tib
yield release, self, counter
print("%8.4f %s: Finished " % (now(), self.name))
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxTime = 400.0 # minutes
counter = Resource(1, name="Clerk", monitored=True) # 1
# Model ----------------------------------
def model(SEED=393939):
seed(SEED)
initialize()
source = Source()
activate(source,
source.generate(number=5, rate=0.1), at=0.0)
simulate(until=maxTime)
return (counter.waitMon.timeAverage(),
counter.actMon.timeAverage()) # 2
# Experiment ----------------------------------
print('Avge waiting = %6.4f\nAvge active = %6.4f\n' % model()) # 3
With the following output:
0.0000 Customer00: Arrived
0.0000 Customer00: Got counter
1.1489 Customer01: Arrived
5.6657 Customer02: Arrived
10.0126 Customer00: Finished
10.0126 Customer01: Got counter
12.8923 Customer03: Arrived
18.5883 Customer04: Arrived
29.3088 Customer01: Finished
29.3088 Customer02: Got counter
44.1219 Customer02: Finished
44.1219 Customer03: Got counter
73.0066 Customer03: Finished
73.0066 Customer04: Got counter
73.8458 Customer04: Finished
Avge waiting = 1.6000
Avge active = 1.0000
Multiple runs¶
To get a number of independent measurements we must replicate the runs using different random number seeds. Each replication must be independent of previous ones so the Monitor and Resources must be redefined for each run. We can no longer allow them to be global objects as we have before.
We will define a function, model
with a parameter runSeed
so
that the random number seed can be different for different runs (between
between #2 and #5). The contents of the function are the same as the
Model/Experiment
in bank11: The bank with a monitor, except for one
vital change.
This is required since the Monitor, wM
, is defined inside the
model
function (#3). A customer can no longer refer to
it. In the spirit of quality computer programming we will pass wM
as a function argument. Unfortunately we have to do this in two steps,
first to the Source
(#4) and then from the Source
to
the Customer
(#1).
model()
is run for four different random-number seeds to get a set
of replications (between #6 and #7).
""" bank12: Multiple runs of the bank with a Monitor"""
from SimPy.Simulation import *
from random import expovariate, seed
# Model components ------------------------
class Source(Process):
""" Source generates customers randomly"""
def generate(self, number, interval, resource, mon):
for i in range(number):
c = Customer(name="Customer%02d" % (i))
activate(c, c.visit(b=resource, M=mon)) # 1
t = expovariate(1.0 / interval)
yield hold, self, t
class Customer(Process):
""" Customer arrives, is served and leaves """
def visit(self, b, M):
arrive = now()
yield request, self, b
wait = now() - arrive
M.observe(wait)
tib = expovariate(1.0 / timeInBank)
yield hold, self, tib
yield release, self, b
# Experiment data -------------------------
maxNumber = 50
maxTime = 2000.0 # minutes
timeInBank = 12.0 # mean, minutes
ARRint = 10.0 # mean, minutes
Nc = 2 # number of counters
theSeed = 393939
# Model ----------------------------------
def model(runSeed=theSeed): # 2
seed(runSeed)
k = Resource(capacity=Nc, name="Clerk")
wM = Monitor() # 3
initialize()
s = Source('Source')
activate(s, s.generate(number=maxNumber, interval=ARRint,
resource=k, mon=wM), at=0.0) # 4
simulate(until=maxTime)
return (wM.count(), wM.mean()) # 5
# Experiment/Result ----------------------------------
theseeds = [393939, 31555999, 777999555, 319999771] # 6
for Sd in theseeds:
result = model(Sd)
print("Avge wait for %3d completions was %6.2f min." %
result) # 7
The results show some variation. Remember, though, that the system is still only operating for 50 customers so the system may not be in steady-state.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 3.66 min.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 2.62 min.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 8.97 min.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 5.34 min.
Final Remarks¶
This introduction is too long and the examples are getting longer. There is much more to say about simulation with SimPy but no space. I finish with a list of topics for further study:
Topics not yet mentioned¶
- GUI input. Graphical input of simulation parameters could be an
advantage in some cases. SimPy allows this and programs using
these facilities have been developed (see, for example, program
MM1.py
in the examples in the SimPy distribution) - Graphical Output. Similarly, graphical output of results can also be of value, not least in debugging simulation programs and checking for steady-state conditions. SimPlot is useful here.
- Statistical Output. The
Monitor
class is useful in presenting results but more powerful methods of analysis are often needed. One solution is to output a trace and read that into a large-scale statistical system such as R. - Priorities and Reneging in queues. SimPy allows processes to request units of resources under a priority queue discipline (preemptive or not). It also allows processes to renege from a queue.
- Other forms of Resource Facilities. SimPy has two other
resource structures:
Levels
to hold bulk commodities, andStores
to contain an inventory of different object types. - Advanced synchronization/scheduling commands. SimPy allows process synchronization by events and signals.
Acknowledgements¶
I thank Klaus Muller, Bob Helmbold, Mukhlis Matti, Karen Turner and other developers and users of SimPy for improving this document by sending their comments. I would be grateful for further suggestions or corrections. Please send them to: vignaux at users.sourceforge.net.
References¶
- Python website: https://www.python.org
- SimPy Classic website: https://github.com/SimPyClassic/SimPyClassic
Appendix A¶
With Python 3 the definition of expovariate changed. In some cases this was back ported to some distributions of Python 2.7. Because of this the output for the bank programs varies. This section contains the older output produced by the original definition of expovariate.
A Customer arriving at a fixed time
5.0 Klaus Here I am
15.0 Klaus I must leave
A Customer arriving at random
10.580923 Klaus Here I am
20.580923 Klaus I must leave
More Customers
2.0000 Tony: Here I am
5.0000 Klaus: Here I am
9.0000 Tony: I must leave
12.0000 Evelyn: Here I am
15.0000 Klaus: I must leave
32.0000 Evelyn: I must leave
Many Customers
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
10.0000 Customer01: Here I am
12.0000 Customer00: I must leave
20.0000 Customer02: Here I am
22.0000 Customer01: I must leave
30.0000 Customer03: Here I am
32.0000 Customer02: I must leave
40.0000 Customer04: Here I am
42.0000 Customer03: I must leave
52.0000 Customer04: I must leave
Many Random Customers
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
12.0000 Customer00: I must leave
21.1618 Customer01: Here I am
32.8968 Customer02: Here I am
33.1618 Customer01: I must leave
33.3790 Customer03: Here I am
36.3979 Customer04: Here I am
44.8968 Customer02: I must leave
45.3790 Customer03: I must leave
48.3979 Customer04: I must leave
A Service Counter
0.000 Customer00: Here I am
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
12.000 Customer00: Finished
21.162 Customer01: Here I am
21.162 Customer01: Waited 0.000
32.897 Customer02: Here I am
33.162 Customer01: Finished
33.162 Customer02: Waited 0.265
33.379 Customer03: Here I am
36.398 Customer04: Here I am
45.162 Customer02: Finished
45.162 Customer03: Waited 11.783
57.162 Customer03: Finished
57.162 Customer04: Waited 20.764
69.162 Customer04: Finished
A server with a random service time
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
0.0000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
14.0819 Customer00: Finished
21.1618 Customer01: Here I am
21.1618 Customer01: Waited 0.000
21.6441 Customer02: Here I am
24.7845 Customer01: Finished
24.7845 Customer02: Waited 3.140
31.9954 Customer03: Here I am
41.0215 Customer04: Here I am
43.9441 Customer02: Finished
43.9441 Customer03: Waited 11.949
49.9552 Customer03: Finished
49.9552 Customer04: Waited 8.934
52.2900 Customer04: Finished
Several Counters but a Single Queue
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
0.0000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
14.0819 Customer00: Finished
21.1618 Customer01: Here I am
21.1618 Customer01: Waited 0.000
21.6441 Customer02: Here I am
21.6441 Customer02: Waited 0.000
24.7845 Customer01: Finished
31.9954 Customer03: Here I am
31.9954 Customer03: Waited 0.000
32.9459 Customer03: Finished
40.8037 Customer02: Finished
41.0215 Customer04: Here I am
41.0215 Customer04: Waited 0.000
43.3562 Customer04: Finished
Several Counters with individual queues
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am. [0, 0]
0.0000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
3.5483 Customer01: Here I am. [1, 0]
3.5483 Customer01: Waited 0.000
4.4169 Customer01: Finished
6.4349 Customer02: Here I am. [1, 0]
6.4349 Customer02: Waited 0.000
7.0368 Customer00: Finished
9.7200 Customer02: Finished
9.8846 Customer03: Here I am. [0, 0]
9.8846 Customer03: Waited 0.000
19.8340 Customer03: Finished
26.2357 Customer04: Here I am. [0, 0]
26.2357 Customer04: Waited 0.000
29.8709 Customer04: Finished
Priority Customers
0.000 Customer00: Queue is 0 on arrival
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
3.548 Customer01: Queue is 0 on arrival
9.412 Customer02: Queue is 1 on arrival
12.000 Customer00: Completed
12.000 Customer01: Waited 8.452
12.299 Customer03: Queue is 1 on arrival
13.023 Customer04: Queue is 2 on arrival
23.000 Guido : Queue is 3 on arrival
24.000 Customer01: Completed
24.000 Guido : Waited 1.000
36.000 Guido : Completed
36.000 Customer02: Waited 26.588
48.000 Customer02: Completed
48.000 Customer03: Waited 35.701
60.000 Customer03: Completed
60.000 Customer04: Waited 46.977
72.000 Customer04: Completed
A priority Customer with Preemption
0.000 Customer00: Queue is 0 on arrival
0.000 Customer00: Waited 0.000
5.477 Customer01: Queue is 0 on arrival
11.978 Customer02: Queue is 1 on arrival
12.000 Customer00: Completed
12.000 Customer01: Waited 6.523
23.000 Guido : Queue is 1 on arrival
23.000 Guido : Waited 0.000
23.350 Customer03: Queue is 2 on arrival
35.000 Guido : Completed
36.000 Customer01: Completed
36.000 Customer02: Waited 24.022
48.000 Customer02: Completed
48.000 Customer03: Waited 24.650
56.664 Customer04: Queue is 0 on arrival
60.000 Customer03: Completed
60.000 Customer04: Waited 3.336
72.000 Customer04: Completed
Balking Customers
0.0000 Customer00: Here I am
0.0000 Customer00: Wait 0.000
8.3884 Customer00: Finished
10.4985 Customer01: Here I am
10.4985 Customer01: Wait 0.000
30.9314 Customer02: Here I am
33.7131 Customer03: Here I am
33.7131 Customer03: BALKING
35.9122 Customer01: Finished
35.9122 Customer02: Wait 4.981
37.3562 Customer04: Here I am
41.2491 Customer05: Here I am
41.2491 Customer05: BALKING
56.6185 Customer02: Finished
56.6185 Customer04: Wait 19.262
59.5365 Customer04: Finished
92.2071 Customer06: Here I am
92.2071 Customer06: Wait 0.000
94.9740 Customer07: Here I am
102.7425 Customer06: Finished
102.7425 Customer07: Wait 7.769
133.5005 Customer07: Finished
balking rate is 0.0150 per minute
Reneging or Abandoning
The Bank with a Monitor
Average wait for 50 completions was 3.430 minutes.
Monitoring a Resource
0.0000 Customer00: Arrived
0.0000 Customer00: Got counter
6.8329 Customer00: Finished
22.2064 Customer01: Arrived
22.2064 Customer01: Got counter
30.1802 Customer01: Finished
32.3277 Customer02: Arrived
32.3277 Customer02: Got counter
34.5627 Customer03: Arrived
42.3374 Customer02: Finished
42.3374 Customer03: Got counter
46.4642 Customer03: Finished
61.7697 Customer04: Arrived
61.7697 Customer04: Got counter
94.1098 Customer04: Finished
Avge waiting = 0.0826
Avge active = 0.6512
Multiple runs
Avge wait for 50 completions was 2.75 min.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 6.01 min.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 5.53 min.
Avge wait for 50 completions was 3.76 min.